SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Dutch Central Bank Sale Announcement Imminent? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Gary H who wrote (17635)3/24/2003 10:18:32 PM
From: Gary H  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 81101
 
More from Jim Sinclair

New York Times article worthy of reflection

Dear Friends:

The New York Times on Sunday had a telling comment which I ask you to
consider. This comment was contained in an article on page A-24 headlined:
"Delaying Talk About the Cost of War."

The article discussed the certainty of the Bush Tax Reduction Package while
the Administration has not yet quantified the potential cost of the war
effort. Please keep in mind that estimates for the full cost of this
action, plus rebuilding, plus macro-economic costs, were estimated in the
"Economist" months ago at from USD$100 Billion to USD$1.2 Trillion.

The telling comment in the Times was: "The administration has stiff-armed,
as far as I am concerned, the congress, those that wanted to know something
about what are the costs of the war."

White House reticence about war costs has crystallized opinion among its
political opponents, some independent observers, and even some Republicans,
that Mr. Bush is willing to suppress information that threatens his agenda.

For this reason, and because the huge run up in the equity market and drop
in gold has come as a result of government released information concerning
the success of the US strategy in Iraq, you have an absolute need to obtain
unbiased professional intelligence on what in fact is happening in Iraq.

If the war has not been won by Wednesday of this week, I strongly recommend
that you purchase the entry level intelligence report issued by Strategic
Forecasting LLC which you can reach at www.stratfor.com.

If the war extends through this coming week, then there is a strong
probability that the huge Dow rally and gold sell-off is based on public
acceptance of a war time propaganda program and possibly not on hard facts.

The press, who believe they have full access to this conflict by being
directly immersed in coalition fighting units, seem to have overlooked that
the government chose those units in which they are placed.

I am also sending you this powerful article on gold by Richard Russell,
Editor in Chief of Dow Theory Letters. The inimitable and venerable Mr.
Russell gained wide recognition via a series of over 30 Dow Theory and
technical articles that he wrote for Barron's during the late-'50s through
the '90s. Through Barron's and via word of mouth, he gained a wide
following.

Russell was the first (in 1960) to recommend gold stocks. He called the top
of the 1949-'66 bull market. And almost to the day he called the bottom of
the great 1972-'74 bear market, and the beginning of the great bull market
which started in December 1974.

Russell's article points to a real disconnect between recent market action
and its underlying fundamentals.

Here's the article:

"The markets are operating on two separate levels. The level it's operating
on now is what I would term the "surface" level, the war, the current
economic statistics, the current psychology.

But under the surface level, we have what Bill Gross is referring to, and
that is the massive debts and deficits that could ultimately sink the
dollar and topple the US as a super-power. Perhaps ironically, the path
that Bush is putting this nation on will simply accelerate this process of
debt and deficit building.

There are two main scenarios regarding the future of the US, at least two
which I take seriously.

The first is held by a number of highly intelligent people such as Bill
Gross above. This scenario holds that the US is headed for increasing
inflation as the Fed is forced to print new oceans of money to cover our
continuing deficits and debts.

The other scenario held by such analysts as Bob Prechter and James Dines is
that we face a deflationary depression, as the bear market bears down
relentlessly on the mountains of debt that is built into the US economy at
every level.

Assuming that one of these scenarios is correct, what is our salvation as
investors? In both cases, I believe the salvation of investors is real
money, better known as gold.

In a major inflation, the purchasing power of the dollar is sure to
decline. If that happens, the case for gold is obvious enough. As the value
of paper money declines, the value of real money (gold) will become clear,
even to the most stubborn anti-gold element.

In a major deflation, the pressure on business would be relentless. In this
case, the Fed would go all out to fight the forces of deflation. Fed
Governor has already announced that the Fed would not hesitate to use its
chief weapon, its "printing press" to fight deflation. The Fed would also
bring interest down to zero or even to a negative level, and it might even
turn to buying stocks if necessary.<html> So in the case of a
deflationary depression, the Fed would flood the world in liquidity,
putting massive pressure on the dollar - and here again investors would
turn to the safety of gold. "

Jim's Sinclair's Comment:

Reviewing the true history of gold you will find that the 1930s was a
positive gold period as gold was utilized by the US and the open market as
a means of fighting deflation. I have already told you why, IMO, that the
85-year Prechter study condemning gold shares in a bear market is flawed.

===========================================================================
Copyright (c) 2003 JIM SINCLAIR'S MINESET () All rights reserved. For
more information visit our website at jsmineset.com or send
mailto:tnxinvestor@tanrange.com
Message sent on Mon Mar 24, 2003 at 1:01:53 PM Pacific Time



To: Gary H who wrote (17635)3/25/2003 11:44:19 AM
From: Alan Whirlwind  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 81101
 
Trying to pick up a penny natural gas stock now. Low ball bid of course.