SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Big Dog's Boom Boom Room -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: energyplay who wrote (20767)3/25/2003 1:32:12 AM
From: Raymond Duray  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 206131
 
energyplay,

I was just now watching Maria Bartiroma on CNBC and she had back to back interviews with Gore Vidal, author, and Daniel Yergin of Cambridge Energy Research Associates.

As most here will know, Vidal is a severe critic of the aggression in Iraq, and he made the point that one of the key reasons that we attacked Iraq was to confiscate the second largest oil reserves on the planet. To my mind, this is well established fact.

Daniel Yergin, who makes his living by selling his services not only to CNBC but many petroleum industry companies, directly refuted Vidal by stating that Canada had the second largest oil reserves in the world. This astonished me. I went back into the records and found this:

bp.com

According to BP, Canada has 0.6% of the world proven reserves of oil. Iraq has 11%.

What can we make of this assertion of a complete lie by a so-called "expert"? Shall we conclude that Daniel Yergin is part of a vicious disinformation campaign designed to distort the understanding of a gullible public? Or is he simply delusional?

[[Note: I fully understand that Yergin will come up with the sophistry that he's included Canada's oil shales and tar sands in his calculation. I'm wondering if he'd admit that he being utterly disingenuous since on average it takes one barrel of oil equivalent energy per barrel produced in order to extract the shale or tar sand resource.]]

Unfortunately, today the question that I have to ask all too often is this: Who isn't lying to us? It seems to be a real short list.



To: energyplay who wrote (20767)3/25/2003 9:19:25 AM
From: quehubo  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 206131
 
Lehman's last expectations was for an injection of 70 bcf. For the 85~ HDD last week and injection 30-40 bcf would be about right. So +/- zero will be good for a few weeks.

Demand should still be good for NG generation as nuke and coal plant outages should be running high for a few more weeks.