SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stop the War! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Crimson Ghost who wrote (2663)3/25/2003 9:06:04 AM
From: Art Bechhoefer  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 21614
 
>>Zionist hawks<< They don't even have to be Zionist hawks--just pro Israel. Note the similar tilt toward Israeli interests now showing up in New York Times editorials. The New York Times has a large Jewish readership, and a great deal of advertising in the Times comes from Jewish firms. It doesn't matter if Lieberman is a hawk or simply pro Israel. The end result is the same.

I'm sure other newspapers, TV, and other media in general feel some pressure not to publish information that places Israel or Jewish intersts in a bad light. One must always ask whether reports in the media represent the whole story, or just a part of the story that is deemed "acceptable."

This morning CNBC featured a Republican congressman doing his best to explain why scud and other missiles that Iraq has are weapons of mass destruction. That explanation should help while the U.S. forces search for something resembling uranium, anthrax, poison gas, etc.

Art



To: Crimson Ghost who wrote (2663)3/25/2003 12:18:29 PM
From: Karen Lawrence  Respond to of 21614
 
Gets funds from Zionists? You're kidding. The Israelis get their money from the American taxpayers and use it to lobby Congress for their goals, they're number two in lobbying. Lieberman is a criminal, but I don't think he's a zionist. However, the Bush Admin has its Neocon zionist representation in Perle and Wolfowitz.