Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (165566)	3/25/2003 12:21:13 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1583380

Ted, <Everything I have read on the incident, and that includes at least ten articles, collaborate the details as described above.> Could you provide links? Professional journalists do not usually add words like "premeditatedly" to any description of the facts, unless they were quoting from someone. Tenchusatsu

To: tejek who wrote (165566)	3/25/2003 12:52:35 PM
From: d[-_-]b	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1583380

tejek, re:The zionazi* bulldozer operator* I see no bias in that article at all. <g> Your outrage has made you blind. Speaking of freedom of speech: Cartoon that started a debate: inform.umd.edu inform.umd.edu inform.umd.edu The same rights that allowed the protesters to rally outside our offices last night allow us to publish the cartoon that so offends them. We respect their rights and insist on ours. To censor the cartoon would be equal to preventing well-meaning individuals from objecting to the cartoon. Ted, Can you support their rights to publish that cartoon as I support Rachel's rights to act as human shield?

To: tejek who wrote (165566)	3/25/2003 1:49:33 PM
From: hmaly	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1583380

Ted Re....The zionazi bulldozer operator saw her walk over and stand in front of his bulldozer he then hesitated for a second, but then revved the engine and sped forward premeditatedly running over Rachel crushing her to death. Sped forward. If you knew anything about that big of a machine, you would know it couldn't have sped forward, because they can't. The top end on these machines are 10 to 15 miles an hr, and it takes awhile to get there. Secondly, I read elsewhere, that she was caught under the dirt being pushed by the machine. If the machine was pushing a decent amount of dirt, it couldn't have gone more than approximately 5 mph. These big machines just don't go that fast. Look at who related the account, and you will figure out the discrepency.