Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (154749)	3/25/2003 8:11:46 PM
From: Victor Lazlo	Respond to of 164684

<<The last gulf war didn't suck>> Sure was for the iraqis. In addition to the regualr combat deaths, the iraqis were routed on the road back to baghdad to prevent all that armor and munitions from being used again by saddam. But for the iraqis it was hell, it didn't just suck. << Somalia sucked and this is the same deal. Looks like an oppressed, armed civilian population with a warlord mentality is the main ingredient to a war sucking or not. >> could be. In this case i think the coalition will be getting more and more help from the Shiite populations as time goes on. They do not like (to say the least) the sunni minority that's aligned with saddam.