Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JohnM who wrote (86140)	3/25/2003 2:19:17 PM
From: bela_ghoulashi	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Ruff! Ruff! (Now can I can bite your ankle?)

To: JohnM who wrote (86140)	3/25/2003 2:42:50 PM
From: LindyBill	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 281500

Tony Blair wins by following that old Political adage, "If you don't like the news, make your own." washingtonpost.com British Rally to Blair but Combat in Press Continues By Jefferson Morley washingtonpost.com Staff Writer Tuesday, March 25, 2003; 9:30 AM Tony Blair is on a roll. The British prime minister's unstinting support for a U.S.-led attack to disarm and overthrow the government of Saddam Hussein in Iraq has gone from deeply unpopular to generally acceptable in the course of about three weeks. When President Bush ordered the U.S. and British forces to attack last week, the traditional sympathy for "Tommy," the mythically typical British soldier, helped rally public opinion to Blair's side. The latest YouGov war poll, published in today's Daily Telegraph newspaper, reported 56 percent of those surveyed now believe the United States and Britain are right to take military action against Iraq and that 65 percent trusted Blair to make the right decisions about the war. Both figures have risen steadily in three successive polls during the past week. But if public opinion is growing more unified, the British press is not. While generally crediting the prime minister with decency, editorialists on the island have not lost the outspoken panache that distinguishes them from their often blander counterparts on this side of the Atlantic. REST AT:http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A21517-2003Mar24?language=printer