Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Stop the War! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: zonder who wrote (2879)	3/25/2003 9:33:28 PM
From: Brumar89	Respond to of 21614

No, actually the FT article didn't say the "exact opposite" of the no-name,no-respect article. Both articles did not describe the same set of persons. Even if the FT article is correct in everything it says, the no-name, no-respect article written by the clearly describes what the embedded reporter saw. The FT writer didn't witness what the embedded reporter saw and vice-versa. Besides as I recall the FT article was full of anonymous quotes, which Partytime has recently informed are worthless. :>)