SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : VOLTAIRE'S PORCH-MODERATED -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: im a survivor who wrote (57542)3/25/2003 6:14:17 PM
From: Sully-  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 65232
 
"Not meaning to stick my nose where it doesn't belong....."

But you did anyway.



To: im a survivor who wrote (57542)3/25/2003 6:22:18 PM
From: Sully-  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 65232
 
"Um Tim, would you like to pull up about 50 posts made by you to me from a year or 2 ago."

Please do so. It will be just as easy now to irrefutably
establish your inability to be factual, honest or accurate
about everything we disagreed upon back then.

That is a fact Keith.

Bring it on...... or shut up.

And use links to provide factual proof. Otherwise I'll be
dealing with your faulty memory & inability to be truthful
once again. If you won't back up your POV with links, I
will not respond.

It's too easy to lie than deal in irrefutable fact, so I
will not be drawn in to your faulty memory of events.

'nuff said Ö¿Ö



To: im a survivor who wrote (57542)3/25/2003 6:55:37 PM
From: Sully-  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 65232
 
"Again, none of my biz"

You are absolutely right & the rest of your post is proof
why you have no business barging into this discussion & it
provides proof of your faulty memory & equally faulty POV.

I suspect this market put an A$$ whoopin on you far worse then you will admitt. Why else would you still be the same combative, insulting and atagonistic person, as you were 2 years ago? The whole world seemed to grow up except you."

Ah, insults & personal attacks as the first resort of
rebuttal. Oh how typical.

First, I have admitted that I lost a lot of money in the
last three years on this & other threads, so there goes
that argument, or should I say baseless, unsupportable
speculation.

Second, I AM NOT "the same combative, insulting and
atagonistic person, as you were <I was> 2 years ago". I'm
not & never was combative. I just have this thing about
those who use lies, deceit & distortions as the main thesis
to support their faulty POV. That is an irrefutable fact
which is clearly supported in my posting history. So much
for that argument, or should I say baseless, unsupportable
speculation.

Third, mature adults do not engage in lies & a massive
disinformation campaign for personal or political gain.
Neither do I....... never have...... never will. However,
that is precisely what you did during our protracted
disagreement. That is precisely what stockman_scott, Ray
Duray & their peers are doing currently. So much for that
argument, or should I say baseless, unsupportable
speculation.

"but I know stockman scott and frankly was shocked to see you insulting somebody that I believe is one of the best people to be found on SI."

Well, that statement speaks volumes. I have exposed many of
stockman scott's posts, articles, etc. to be filled with
outrageous lies, blatant distortions & spurious slanderous
allegations that have no basis in fact or reality. The
posting history on his thread is irrefutable proof of that.
If that isn't sufficient follow each & every link in this
post................

Message 18752826

Keith, it is so easy to sit at the keyboard & make up
baseless, unsupportable bullshit to attack others as you
have just done. It is much harder to stick to irrefutable
facts to make your point. So far you have failed miserably.
All you have done is post wild speculation that you cannot
back with factual evidence because it simply isn't true.

When you begin to provide cold, hard, irrefutable fact, I
will gladly engage you.

Until then, good bye.

Ö¿Ö