SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Karen Lawrence who wrote (86336)3/26/2003 12:18:49 AM
From: Nadine Carroll  Respond to of 281500
 
Scott: The war isn't going as planned. Some say it's looking like another Vietnam. Scott Ritter isn't that optimistic

Why, does Scott Ritter want to keep his pension from Saddam? Anybody who had an ounce of credibility left would wait, oh I don't know, at least a whole week into the war before declaring it a "quagmire."

ROFLMAO



To: Karen Lawrence who wrote (86336)3/26/2003 1:40:27 AM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
U.S. brass backpedal from early war goals

Rumsfeld, Gen. Myers now claim shock-and-surrender not objective

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted: March 26, 2003
1:00 a.m. Eastern
By Paul Sperry
© 2003 WorldNetDaily.com

worldnetdaily.com

<<...WASHINGTON -- Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld today blamed media military "analysts" for creating an impression in the public mind that U.S. forces would topple Saddam Hussein's regime quickly.

Asked if he had raised expectations of a short war unrealistically high with talk of a "shock-and-awe" campaign, Rumsfeld demurred. "Not by me, not by Gen. Myers," he insisted, referring to Richard Myers, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

He instead blamed media "analysts" for the impression that fighting Saddam's forces would be a "cake walk" similar to the last Gulf war.

"Analysts say what they think," Rumsfeld said at the Pentagon press briefing. "If some analyst wants to say it's going to be a cake walk and it turns out not to be a cake walk, the fact of the matter is, we have said repeatedly we can't say how long it will last."

But at a Christian Science Monitor breakfast held here on March 4, Myers told a small gathering of reporters that a "short conflict" in Iraq could be achieved by shocking Saddam's regime into surrendering with an overwhelming display of force...>>



To: Karen Lawrence who wrote (86336)3/26/2003 2:15:59 AM
From: KLP  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
After 6 days at battle, and he's an expert, eh? WOW! 6 whole days.

What are these people who think Rome was built in a day thinking?