To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (3011 ) 3/26/2003 1:56:59 AM From: Rick McDougall Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 21614 <OH! So this really is about Bush and you would support this if Slick Willie was in the Oval Office!>.....I would suggest that anybody with an IQ in excess of 25 would not support this war of killing Iraqi innocent/helpless women & children...especially under the false pretense of terrorism when in fact the sad state of the US economy is the real reason. <If this is just about oil, why didn't we just keep Kuwait? Or invade Venezuela instead?>.....US already controls the oil flow out of those countries, one by fiscal threatening/manipulation & the other by a military umbrella. No need to attack as the oil is already delivered. <Kuwait. Closer and easier target>......last time I checked an atlas Kuwait was in the vicinity of Iraq....might be wrong there.....will have to check Fox news to get a GPS fixin on that country. As for <easier targets>....sure, Kuwait only has 11 people, 13 less than Iraq...however maybe US is awed by Kuwaiti air, navel & ground forces...formidable.....also world outrage would be too extreme for US to handle. < 911 happened, Mr. OBL said, because the US has troops in Saudi. The US has troops in Saudi to protect Saudi and Kuwait from Saddam and to enforce the no-fly zones. If there were no Saddam, there would be no need for troops in Saudi and OBL could just be a billionaire playboy gambling in London casinos. Do you now see it is necessary to sink Saddam to drain this swamp?>........actually that entire statement is full of multiple holes & not even worth challenging. At first glance it wreaks with somebody that has the personality of a woodtick. However I think you have an ulterior motive...I believe that you are antiwar & your posts are designed to bring out the best in JO, KL, PT, etc. ,who are people that actually know the time of day......to that end LL, you are doing a good job Just passing thru<bg>