Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: stockman_scott who wrote (15573)	3/26/2003 12:58:46 AM
From: Softechie	Respond to of 89467

Iraqis are not fighting for Saddam. They're fighting for their own country. That's one thing Da Idiot isn't aware of...

To: stockman_scott who wrote (15573)	3/26/2003 10:10:08 AM
From: T L Comiskey	Respond to of 89467

"While it is still possible that the Republican Guard and Iraqi security services may turn on their leader, such hopeful predictions run squarely against the behavior of these forces in the 1991 Persian Gulf war" Somehow the Big Brains have not figured 'Love of Country' into the equation....... This is one of the oldest cultures on Earth........ Most Americans cant even fathom the History Lesson here.. Outrage was expressed over Al Jezerra airing a photo of a very young boy with half his head blown away by 'Shock and Awe'.......... This Loss will not be bought off with Pop Tarts and Cream Of Wheat...... Rumsfeld and Cheney should be proud of their handiwork.. They helped create Saddam's stranglehold on Iraq.. I doubt the 'collaterally damaged' appreciate their attempt to cleanse Iraq of him now T

To: stockman_scott who wrote (15573)	3/26/2003 11:35:55 AM
From: Skywatcher	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 89467

Bush just can't stop being a complete sellout to Prince Dick and his stinkin company Hellaburnin Cronyism and Rebuilding The Bush administration began handing out private contracts Monday to build water treatment systems, airports, bridges and other foundations of what President Bush envisions as a "peaceful and prosperous Iraq." The director of the U.S. Agency for International Development, Andrew Natsios, calls it "the largest disaster relief response we have ever put together." No kidding. Since this nation's ultimate victory in the region rides less on the accuracy of its munitions than on whether it lives up to its stated ideals, the importance of the rebuilding effort can't be overstated. The long-term battle to help Iraq is off to a bad start, however, with close U.S. allies like Britain fuming that the Bush administration has failed to involve them in the postwar reconstruction planning since in a secret process last month it invited a select group of U.S. corporations to bid for the tens of billions of dollars in work. The contracts, critics allege, could let the U.S. victors horde the spoils. The five companies that submitted bids -- Kellogg, Brown & Root, a division of Halliburton Co., the firm once headed by Vice President Dick Cheney; Bechtel Group Inc.; Fluor Corp.; Parsons Corp.; and Louis Berger Group Inc. -- gave $2.8 million in political donations from 1999 to 2002, 68% to Republicans and 32% to Democrats, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. It's no surprise that Chris Patten, the European Union's external affairs minister, condemned the administration's slighting of European contractors such as ABB Ltd. and Siemens as "exceptionally maladroit." The most worrying complaint comes from nongovernmental organizations that have been crucial to rebuilding Afghanistan but that so far have been shut out of any meaningful role in rebuilding Iraq. Take Oxfam, for instance. The relief group says U.S. officials have yet to grant it a license to operate in Iraq, even though it requested one in October. Oxfam has international legitimacy because it is not allied with national or partisan politics and has done humanitarian work successfully after wars in Afghanistan, Bosnia and southern Africa. If Congress doesn't pressure the Bush administration to open up bidding and involvement in postwar construction to a wide array of the best-qualified groups, it will not have a chance to do so later. That's because the contracts give the primary contractors an extraordinary level of authority to choose subcontractors and others who will share in the work -- and the money to be made -- from rebuilding Iraq. It's fine if rebuilding Iraq brings money back into the U.S. economy. But the Bush administration and Congress should also use the contracts as tools to revive some of the global alliances demolished in the run-up to war. As the administration sets forth its plans to rebuild Iraq, it should be keenly aware that the world is watching. The awarding of contracts must be seen as fair, with no bias toward domestic political friends, and based on which companies and groups can do the job well. The right reconstruction effort not only will help the people of Iraq start anew, it will be a tool to help repair frayed international relationships. CC