SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
SI - Site Forums : Silicon Investor - Welcome New SI Members! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: John Busby who wrote (16685)3/26/2003 3:03:32 PM
From: Jorj X Mckie  Respond to of 32914
 
Well, I would point you to them, but the searches don't go back far enough<GGG>

ok, here it is. The way that I read SI, I put my cursor on the "next" radio button and I click through the posts. As long as I don't hit a post that is using fixed fonts, the "next" button doesn't move. In other words, I just click and read, click and read, click and read. But, since the navigation buttons follow the right margin of the text, if I hit one of those posts, I have to go down to the horizontal scroll bar and scroll over just to hit the next button. Where this may not be a problem that our friend Joe has run into, I use a charting style call Point and Figure charts. We post these charts on the threads that I am active on. The following post will have an example. When you hit the next button from this post, see if you can press the "next" button on that post without moving your cursor.

My request is simply that the navigation buttons don't follow the right margin, that they are at a fixed place on the page. (BTW, I use SI Classic).

If you don't want to do it, just say so. Tell me that the change isn't important enough. But to continuously avoid acknowledging that I am bringing something up as an issue is offensive.

And where the thread monitor thinks that I am not working with you enough, after a couple of years of being blown off repeatedly, I think that I have done my part about "working with you". And yes, I realize that there were other entities who had the responsibility, but you also know that that doesn't matter when the pattern continues.

again, I can take "no" for an answer, just acknowledge whether or not you are going to do anything about it.

P&F chart coming up next.



To: John Busby who wrote (16685)3/26/2003 3:03:41 PM
From: Jorj X Mckie  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 32914
 
© StockCharts.com
1,575.00 | + | | | 1,575.00
1,560.00 | + | | | 1,560.00
1,545.00 | + | | | 1,545.00
1,530.00 | +| | | 1,530.00
1,515.00 | C |+ | | 1,515.00
1,500.00 | X O| + | | 1,500.00
1,485.00 | X O| + | | 1,485.00
1,470.00 | X O| + | | 1,470.00
1,455.00 | X O|X + | | 1,455.00
1,440.00 | X X O|X O + + | | 1,440.00
1,425.00 | X O X X X X O|X O X + |High| 1,425.00
1,410.00 | X O X O X O X X O X O|X O X O | | 1,410.00
1,395.00 | X O X X O X O X O X O X O|X O X O | | 1,395.00
1,380.00 | X O X O X O X O X O X O O|1 O X O | | 1,380.00<
1,365.00 | X O X O X O X O X O X O|X O X | | 1,365.00
1,350.00 | O X O X O X X O B O X O|X O X 3 X | | 1,350.00
1,335.00 | O O X O X O X O X X X O X O| O X O X O X |Avg | 1,335.00
1,320.00 | O O X O X X O X O X O X O | O X O X O X | | 1,320.00
1,305.00 | O X O X O X O X O X O X | O X O O X | | 1,305.00
1,290.00 | O X 8 X O X O X O X O | 2 X O X | | 1,290.00
1,275.00 | O X O X O 9 X O X X | O O X | | 1,275.00
1,260.00 | O X O X O O X O X | O | | 1,260.00
1,245.00 | O X O X O X O X | |Low | 1,245.00
1,230.00 | O X O X O X X O | | | 1,230.00
1,215.00 | O X O O X O A X | | | 1,215.00
1,200.00 | O O X O X O X | | | 1,200.00
1,185.00 | O X O X O X | | | 1,185.00
1,170.00 | O O O X | | | 1,170.00
1,155.00 | O X | | | 1,155.00
1,140.00 | O X | | | 1,140.00
1,125.00 | O X | | | 1,125.00
1,110.00 | O | | | 1,110.00
1,095.00 | | | | 1,095.00
1,080.00 | | | | 1,080.00
1,065.00 | | | | 1,065.00
1,050.00 | | | | 1,050.00
03



To: John Busby who wrote (16685)3/26/2003 4:09:33 PM
From: Jorj X Mckie  Respond to of 32914
 
well, I actually like the peoplemark and subjectmark check boxes.

The first change in years that I have liked.



To: John Busby who wrote (16685)3/26/2003 4:31:40 PM
From: Justin C  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 32914
 
On SI Classic - SubjectMarks page, "Mar" dates with a 2-digit hour (10,11,12) are still wrapping to two lines, apparently because of the extra-wide letter "M" in Mar. An easy solution would be to use a numeric date and a lower case am/pm ...

Mar 26, 2003 12:25 PM
03-26-03 12:25 pm

Also on the SubjectMarks page, the check box is crowded against the thread titles, making it visually cluttered. Changing the date to numeric per above would also allow for a little extra space to the right of the check box.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News