Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Stop the War! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Augustus Gloop who wrote (3481)	3/26/2003 5:16:29 PM
From: ChrisJP	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 21614

Re: Chemical weapons: Not sure how reliable this is, but here it is anyway: cbn.com And my response: Message 18757861 Chris

To: Augustus Gloop who wrote (3481)	3/26/2003 5:17:30 PM
From: Thomas M.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 21614

Thus far the major complaint has been lack of proof. Since there was no proof, we couldn't even get to the stage of the debate of what to do if he had a smattering of chemical weapons left over from when he was our good friend and ally. Furthermore, since Bush invaded before finding anything remotely resembling evidence of chemical weapons, this establishes conclusively that chemical weapons were not a pretext for the invasion. Finally, if Saddam's little arsenal is justification for an invasion, then the U.S. would be in big trouble. sunshine-project.org Tom