SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stop the War! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Just_Observing who wrote (3601)3/26/2003 10:50:25 PM
From: Just_Observing  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 21614
 
War, Hitler And Cheney

By Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr.
LaRouchein2004.com
3-26-3

The immediate situation of the U.S. is summed up as follows: At this moment, as I had forewarned you in 1999-2000, we are plunging into a world depression comparable to, but worse than that of the Herbert Hoover Depression of 1929-1933. As I forewarned you in an address, broadcast at the beginning of 2001, new would-be Adolf Hitlers have now appeared, this time inside the U.S.A. Those would-be Hitlers now threaten the whole world with the kinds of wars for which the world later hung Nazi leaders, at Nuremberg: the new Hitlers from inside the U.S.A. and Blair's government, who act exactly as Hitler threatened Czechoslovakia in 1938, and invaded Poland in 1939.

The pivotal feature of that warfare, into which an already bankrupt U.S. has just been plunged, is the de facto usurpation of the function of a still-sitting President by Halliburton's Vice-President Cheney, and by a gang of his organized-crime-linked lackeys polluting not only the Departments of Defense and State, but also polluting, and virtually castrating elected and other leaders of the nominal opposition, the Democratic Party.

Ironically, but not accidentally, the present war-like situation in the Department of Defense, including the public rug-chewing exhibitions by Secretary Rumsfeld, reminds today's serious historians of the way in which Adolf Hitler and his Roman Legions-modelled SS, ultimately destroyed that German military which would-be Caesar Hitler's gang feared and hated so intensely.

All too obviously, the leading war-makers inside the Bush Administration today are mere lackeys, nasty pimps like the Leporello of Mozart's famous opera. These real-life Leporellos, such as the politically pimpish Wolfowitz and Ashcroft, were spawned, chiefly, by Chicago University and associated circles of a prominent fascist ideologue, the late Professor Leo Strauss. This Strauss was a follower of the Carl Schmitt who crafted the law under which Hitler became dictator of Germany; so, are Strauss's ardent followers inside the Bush Administration today. This fascist, Strauss, who created Wolfowitz, was imported to the U.S. from the Germany of Carl Schmitt and Hitler-midwife Hjalmar Schacht, at the time that also the later Robert Hutchins-sponsored Strauss was already known to be a fanatical follower of the leading Nazi ideologue Martin Heidegger.

However, like the Nazi SS enforcers, lackeys Wolfowitz, Perle, Bolton, Wurmser, Feith, and so on, are merely expendable hoodlums adorned with political motley. To understand them, you must look to those who created them and put them into their present positions. You must look to the London-backed Hjalmar Schachts and von Papens of the modern U.S.A., including the like of the Conrad Blacks, the Rupert Murdochs, George Shultz, and the Shultz-allied forces behind the Halliburton firms' government and other connections.

The essence of the matter is exactly what I warned you might happen, in a broadcast address I delivered just before the inauguration of President George W. Bush, Jr. We are in an accelerating world depression, while this year's U.S. Federal deficit already soars in the direction of the $1 trillions mark. The U.S.A. experienced its "Reichstag Fire" on September 11, 2001, and the storm-trooper legions of Vice-President Cheney marched forth from those smoking ruins, brandishing their {Mein Kampf} doctrine of "preventive nuclear" war. This is the Nazi-like doctrine which Cheney had adopted in 1991, then in his capacity of Secretary of Defense. Led by Cheney's and Rumsfeld's lackeys, the depression-wracked U.S. is presently marching down the road toward self-inflicted Hell, unless the war is stopped about now.

We are, therefore, now trapped in a war for which no foreseeable exit is provided. It is not an "Iraq War"; it is a virtually endless world war, unless we stop it: unless you, personally, contribute to stopping it. It is a war already spreading, as the military forces of Turkey invade northern Iraq, in preparation to deal with a Kurdish campaign to carve a Kurdish state out of a region including large chunks of Turkey and Transcaucasia. This is a war of incalculable implications, being pushed by dangerous, and largely morally demented lunatics, such as Mother Cheney's Chickenhawks.

This is a spreading war, which threatens to topple most, or even all of the existing governments of the Middle East. As a result of the earlier foolishness of the Bush Administration policy toward the government of South Korea, President Bush's brainless launching of an absolutely unlawful war against Iraq, has created the grave possibility of an otherwise unlikely, nuclear-warfare incident between the U.S.A. and North Korea, with the possibility of a third nuclear-weapons detonation against Japan.

None of this insanity could have happened this way, had the U.S.A. been given the option of choosing a qualified Presidential candidate for the 2000 elections, instead of being presented with no real option but the utterly incompetent, but bad-tempered patsies Al Gore and George W. Bush. This war could not have begun as it did, without the role of Conrad Black's Hudson Institute in crafting the campaign to split both the Republican and Democratic parties, to elect a "Bull Moose" ticket of a pair of pro-war fanatics, Senators John McCain and Joseph Lieberman, in 2004. Whatever wrong the under-qualified President Bush has done, he remains the poor patsy from whom the pack of Cheney-Rumsfeld lackeys have managed to gain almost anything they wished, so far. However, this would not have been possible had the Democratic Party itself not fallen under the top-down control of the same behind-the-scenes forces which control Dick "Lady Macbeth" Cheney.

Already, bad as the present, thuggish National Committee leadership of the Democratic Party is, at this moment, President George Bush's chances of reelection are less than zero. Karl Rove must face the painful truth: With the outbreak of this war, Rove's candidate has just shot his own wad. Therefore, the more important, remaining question is, will there actually be a 2004 election conducted under the auspices of the actual U.S. Constitution? If the U.S. does not get out of the present war, by such possible means as returning the Iraq issues to the UNO, the chances for civilization as a whole quickly become very, very grim.

Amid all these fearful uncertainties of war, depression, and threatened Nazi-like forms of dictatorship, even here, I can assure you of one thing: If enough of you back my 2004 Democratic Presidential pre-candidacy now, we, together with even the well-meaning, but cowardly fellows hiding under their Congressional benches, can reform the Democratic Party organization's presently corrupt, DLC-dominated, right-wing leadership. In that case, we have a good chance of getting out of the terrible situation building up now. That is something any citizen can do. Ask yourself: Do you have the "guts" to do at least that much?

For discussion, a free update and/or an organizer's kit, call 888-347-3258.

rense.com



To: Just_Observing who wrote (3601)3/26/2003 10:50:50 PM
From: Secret_Agent_Man  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 21614
 
Republican Guard column advances on US Marines

By Donald Macintyre in Qatar and John Lichfield

27 March 2003

Two large forces of Republican Guards were reported to be advancing towards US troops yesterday, in what may be the beginning of the first significant Iraqi counter-attack.

The apparent double thrust south from Baghdad towards Nasiriyah and Najaf – the largest Iraqi deployment of the war so far – follows two days of virtual suicide attacks on US armoured forces by columns of light vehicles, ranging from pick-up trucks to taxis. Up to 700 Iraqis are said to have died in two battles near Najaf on Tuesday in which American tanks were attacked by trucks armed with machine-guns and grenade launchers. Two tanks were damaged but American sources could not say whether there were any US casualties.

An unspecified number of US tanks and Bradley fighting vehicles were destroyed in an attack by another force of makeshift Iraqi vehicles, armed with rocket launchers and automatic rifles at Abu Sukhayr, 13 miles south-east of Najaf, yesterday. An American officer said he believed the US crews had escaped from their vehicles but said their fate was unknown.

Last night the Iraqis seemed to be ready to take the war to the enemy on an even larger scale. US sources reported a move south from Kut by an estimated 3,000 Republican Guards, using the cover of the sandstorms that have grounded most American warplanes and helicopters.

The column of Republican Guards – which was seen by American surveillance aircraft – was advancing in 1,000 vehicles towards Nasiriyah, putting them on a collision course with the First Marine Expeditionary Force, heading north.

CNN reported yesterday that American intelligence had detected another advance by a column of 1,000 vehicles, including tanks, from Baghdad towards Najaf.

Before the attacks, the Allies had been talking of slowing or consolidating their advance on Baghdad to concentrate on "mopping up" the guerrilla activity south of the furthest US point of advance. The direct attacks on armoured units and the movement of two columns southwards will force Allied commanders to think again.

Whatever the mismatch in firepower, the Iraqis seem, however briefly, to have seized the initiative.

Brigadier General Vincent Brooks told a press briefing at American central command in Qatar: "We've not seen any significant movements [before] of that type of force."

Another Allied source said that there were "significant Iraqi movements" on the road south from Kut. Weather permitting, he said, the Iraqi column would be under attack from RAF Harriers and US ground attack aircraft.

The six divisions of Republican Guards had been dug in around Baghdad and were not expected to move into the open to face the superior equipment of the Allies and expose themselves to air attacks.

It was unclear last night whether the two columns of 1,000 vehicles included many tanks. Their intention might be to attack the marines head on or it might be to fan out into the desert and reinforce the small groups of Iraqis who have been harassing marines and ambushing supply convoys.

Although Nasiriyah was "captured" by the marines three days ago, bands of "irregulars" – either soldiers in civilian clothes or members of Saddam Hussein's Fedayeen "martyrs brigade" – are still operating in the area. The town came under heavy mortar fire yesterday.

A convoy of US Marines also came under machine-gun fire from several directions as it moved north from Nasiriyah carrying fuel, food and ammunition towards the main marine force yesterday afternoon. There were no reports of casualties. Whatever the precise Iraqi tactics may be, it appears that the Republican Guards – regarded as the most reliable soldiers in the Iraqi army – are not prepared to sit still to be attacked from the air by the heavily armed forces converging on Baghdad from three directions. There were reports yesterday that other Republican Guard units may also be on the move, possibly to replace the 3,000 men who are moving south.

The intention of the Iraqi commanders may be to sow confusion in the Allied forces and – even at great cost to themselves – inflict as much damage as possible before the beginning of the siege of Baghdad proper. Significant Allied casualties, even in one-sided battles lost by the Iraqis, could jolt public opinion in the US and Britain and provide Iraqi propagandists with more television footage of dead or captured Allied troops. Either way, there has been a significant shift in Iraqi tactics in the past 48 hours. Initially, the Iraqis appeared content to launch opportunist ambushes on supply columns and other soft targets.

In the past two days, the so-called irregulars have turned to full-frontal attacks on heavily armed American units.

The battle between US armoured vehicles and light Iraqi vehicles at Abu Sukhayr continued after nightfall yesterday. The Iraqi force, consisting of pick-up trucks and similar vehicles to which machine-guns and rocket launchers had been attached, was attempting to seize control of a bridge over the Euphrates river. There were no immediate reports of American casualties but an officer close to the scene of the fighting told some reporters that several US tanks and armoured personnel carriers had been knocked out.

A similar assault on an armoured column in a thick sandstorm by a force of Iraqi light vehicles on Tuesday led to what was probably the bloodiest single battle of the war so far. Tanks from 7th Cavalry Regiment of the 3rd Infantry came under attack from scores of vehicles carrying guns and rockets.

American sources said up to 500 Iraqis had been killed. Two tanks were knocked out. About 200 Iraqis were said to have been killed in a similar attack further east.
 

26 March 2003 21:48

Search this site:
Go
 Printable Story