Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : HITSGALORE.COM (HITT) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Janice Shell who wrote (6495)	3/26/2003 11:54:16 PM
From: EL KABONG!!!	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7056

Hi Janice, I sorely wish that would happen. My own opinion is that she's likely long since transferred any real assets elsewhere. Or spent them. I think the daughter is still into Arabian horse competition, not an inexpensive hobby. The guy I feel sorry for is Schroeder, or whatever his name was that was suing her some time ago now. Won't be nuttin' left for him anywhere, presuming he wins or won... KJC

To: Janice Shell who wrote (6495)	3/27/2003 12:45:54 AM
From: EL KABONG!!!	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 7056

Hmmm... I think she may have run out of money... Lost a default judgement to Wells Fargo Bank for $388,015.60 on 10/25/02; pro per for Ms. Wilcher Lost a default(?) judgement to Ashland Real Estate for $29,069.63 on 7/19/02; pro per for Ms. Wilcher & Grace Trust Sued by State of Arizona and Richard C. Houseworth; case against Ms. Wilcher and Life Foundation Worldwide, Inc dismissed on 8/13/02; again pro per Default judgement applied/pending on 2/6/03; plaintiff: Crimson Canyon LLC; defending: Ms. Wilcher, Life Foundation Trust, Josephine Belanger Gatlin and Tom Honsa (all pro per) Sued by Pacific Indemnity Co; defending: Ms. Wilcher pro per; dismissed 3/10/03 In older lawsuits... It appears that Francesco Maresco has won a $100,000.00 judgement against Ms. Wilcher (pro per); most recent activity was a writ of garnishment on 3/12/03. In Richard Schroeder's case, the most recent activity was that the attorney for Ms. Wilcher and Ms. Pfurtscheller (believed to be Ms. Wilcher's daughter) has withdrawn from the case on 3/21/03. In another case where, strangely enough, Ms. Wilcher was plaintiff and Mr. Schroeder was defendant along with Natasha Pfurtscheller and Life Foundation Trust, Mr. Schroeder won a judgement against Ms. Wilcher totalling $3,534,500.00 on 3/17/00. Most recent activity on 2/19/03 indicates attorney's fees to be assessed, costs, and sanctions pursuant to ARCP 37 (whatever that means, sounds like more money to me). There are numerous other cases, including a judgement to Central Bank for over $15,000. Most were dismissals though. Sounds to me like Ms. Wilcher has some money problems, and for some reason, likes representing herself in court. What's that old saying about a lawyer who represents himself? KJC