Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Ask God -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Berry Picker who wrote (34749)	3/28/2003 11:58:51 AM
From: Scott Shaw	Respond to of 39621

Brian, What kind of church do you go to?...do you go to Church of Christ? SS

To: Berry Picker who wrote (34749)	3/28/2003 1:14:01 PM
From: Greg or e	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 39621

I expect an apology from you Brian. You are the one who brought up the JW's. I pointed out that they believed Christ returned in Oct 1874. Since then they have admitted that 1874 was wrong, but claim that Christ returned INVISIBLY in 1914. That is very similar to the false doctrine that you are espousing isn't it? That's why I mentioned it. They also have some funny ideas about the resurrection. Why do they deny the physical resurrection? I'm not sure but I suspect it has to do with explaining how Christ could return invisibly. That also seems to be the driving force behind your denial of the current physicality of Christ's body. Error begets error Brian and yours are multiplying. "DO you even have a clue what you a proclaiming to be heresy?" I am "a proclaiming" that to deny the the future bodily return of Jesus Christ to this earth and to to deny that the hope of the believer today is that redemption includes both body and soul, is indeed a heresy.