SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: stockman_scott who wrote (15915)3/28/2003 12:48:28 PM
From: lurqer  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
Increassingly I see the likelihood of no endgame. The guerilla warfare that Saddam is mounting with its goal of maximizing US casualties differs little from an Islamic insurgency campaign in the post-Saddam period. While there may be some question about the degree of sacrifice for Saddam

However, historian Stanley Karnow says the Vietnam experience raises a tough question for Iraq's guerrilla fighters: How many are willing to die for their cause? In his interviews with North Vietnamese and Viet Cong commanders after the war, he says, they told him they would have been willing to sustain unlimited numbers of casualties, and fight for five or 10 years more -- anything so as not to be defeated by the Americans. If Iraqis loyal to Saddam Hussein are willing to die en masse, as the Vietnamese were, then the U.S. is in trouble, he thinks. But the tactic won't be so successful if they aren't.

From

Message 18765330

there should be no question about martyrdom for Islam. Getting Saddam won't be easy. By the time it is accomplished a pattern will be set, that renders Saddam irrelevant. The same sort of warfare is likely to continue unabated. The neo-cons will be left saying "Wha Happened?" 'Course given their proclivities, they'll soon find a scapegoat. Probably be those anti-war pacifists that "stabbed the military in the back". You know - standard party line stuff.

JMO

lurqer



To: stockman_scott who wrote (15915)3/28/2003 3:55:47 PM
From: Jim Willie CB  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 89467
 
I sense desperation for oil, as Arab boycott threatens
my guess is that an Arab oil action against the USA was months away

some may question such paranoia
but I expect the Saudi Govt not to last much longer
our presence in Prince Sultan airbase destabilizes the royal family like nothing before in its previous 50 yrs

fundamental Wahhabism is growing in strength inside SA
our days on that base are numbered

attacking Iraq under the thin guise of Weapons of Mass Destruction is laughable at worst, very questionable at best
but it opened the door to our attack
and it enables us to secure three precious quantities:

1. oil supply
2. airbases
3. continued dollar link to oil

the only WMD that I see are delivered by US Forces
when anyone hears or sees any owned by Iraqis, let's certainly take note
in a few weeks, it wont matter
because by then, we will be fighting because other soldiers fighting earlier were killed


this is insane
I am ashamed to be an American
/ jim



To: stockman_scott who wrote (15915)3/28/2003 3:55:58 PM
From: lurqer  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
Always a discrepancy between theory and practice.

Message 18767466

lurqer



To: stockman_scott who wrote (15915)3/30/2003 8:55:48 PM
From: lurqer  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 89467
 
Another surprise.

Message 18774964

lurqer



To: stockman_scott who wrote (15915)3/30/2003 10:53:06 PM
From: lurqer  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
A Scotsman's view.

thescotsman.co.uk

lurqer