Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Moufassa's Lair -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tsigprofit who wrote (12324)	3/28/2003 11:16:25 AM
From: moufassa7	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13660

Protesting at this point only helps Saddam. Of course, everybody in this country has the right to choose sides. Cannot choose in Baghdad though.

To: tsigprofit who wrote (12324)	3/28/2003 11:32:35 AM
From: KevinThompson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13660

"illegal war of aggression, not backed by the UN, or most of the world" Just curious, where does authority come from? The UN? Consensus of 'most of the world'? If the UN (never mind that Resolution 1441 was passed) approved this campaign to get rid of this wicked man in Iraq, or if 'most of the world' thought this was a good idea, would we then have authority to prosecute this campaign that threatens our national security? Would that be a reason then NOT to protest? We would likely be taking the very same actions that we are now, but justified by the world? Since when did our US Constitution become subordinate to World opinion? Just curious. I must have missed that somewhere - it's been a long time since I've been in a US Government class.