SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Classic TA Workplace -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jjstingray who wrote (69887)3/28/2003 2:13:17 PM
From: Shack  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 209892
 
Its a bit of an anomaly. There were huge blocks of April an May 22 QQQ puts crossed but the $ value is somewhat low since the options were at $0.05 an $0.25 respectively.

Still it was a few million $.



To: jjstingray who wrote (69887)3/28/2003 3:05:45 PM
From: mishedlo  Respond to of 209892
 
Yes but not really.
1) strike 22's are so far OTM that I do not think they mean a thing.
2) It was double counted (closing May puts and opening April Puts) One was a bullish play the other a bearish play. Net affect is actually meaningless but shows up as a huge spike
3) The amt of actual $ at risk now is way less
4) This kind of nonsense is why I do not like this ratio and I have harped about this at length

We need to look at OI this evening for a better read IMO.

M


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News