Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Saturn V who wrote (173851)	3/28/2003 7:32:27 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Respond to of 186894

Saturn, <The Al Qaida operatives are north in Kurdish regions outside Saddam's control.> Not according to the Sydney Herald: smh.com.au Al Qaeda members were said to have been fighting near Basra alongside Iraqis. Tenchusatsu

To: Saturn V who wrote (173851)	3/28/2003 8:03:24 PM
From: willcousa	Respond to of 186894

Have your doubts but let's remember this little conversation because the facts will become well known in due time.

To: Saturn V who wrote (173851)	3/29/2003 12:11:27 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor	Respond to of 186894

All the evidence linking Iraq to Al Qaida and terrorism is speculative.Maybe Rumsfeld & Co know better, and have intelligence which says otherwise. But given Rumsfeld's recent glaring lapses of judgement, I have serious doubts. Plus the Bush administration has a tendency to rename every arab group that is fighting the US in some capacity "al quida". For example when we were in Afganistan, there was some al quida there but most of who we were fighting was the taliban. Fox news reported the enemy fire as "al quida". I think this overt mischaracterization of the enemy comes from the Bush WH.