Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Stop the War! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Doug R who wrote (5210)	3/29/2003 1:51:41 PM
From: Sojourner Smith	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 21614

Instead of insulting me, why don't state a clear argument why they would not help in getting Saddam. My thinking is they helped us stop that speedboat the other day and offered some hope of being more moderate. If we are unable to take Baghdad without high loss of our troops and civilians, then we need to go to Iran and say go ahead and let the Iraqi exiles come in. I am concerned about Iran and their anti-Israel tactics, but I think we have some hope of the being more moderate. Here is the equation: We try and get Iran and Turkey to help. Iran could become stronger, but they already are strong and if we remove Saddam, then there is one less threat. Turkey would get Northern Iraq and the big oil money. They would love us for that. (maybe) Since you can up with no solution other than retreat and isolationism, I question your motives.