Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Win Smith who wrote (87761)	3/29/2003 4:32:07 PM
From: Neocon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

No, Win, it has always been perfectly straightforward. The exigent circumstance leading to the military option is the danger of the Iraqi regime entering into a strategic partnership with groups like Al Quaida and supplying them with weapons of mass destruction, especially, eventually, nuclear devises. However, in discussing the effects of war on the Iraqi people, it is notable that they will ultimately benefit from the overthrow of the regime. And since we are committed to stick around to stabilize the situation and aid a new regime, and ensure a democratic outcome, why not call it "Operation Iraqi Freedom"?