Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Stop the War! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: matthew (Hijacked) who wrote (5330)	3/29/2003 6:30:12 PM
From: Sojourner Smith	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 21614

Different from UTAH - the Kurds have been there since Alexander the Great. What would Iraqi do? They are kind of busy right now. Bush stated and I believe him and agree, there should be a Palestinian State that is viable. That means that cities like Nablus and Jericho would no longer be disconnected islands. Meaning Israel would have to give land back. Here is the main point that Palestinians and the peace-activists fail to grasp. If the US is unsuccessful in Iraq and cannot stop the extremists in the region, there will be no reason for Israel to come to the table. The US would not ask Israel to give up their security issues. If we are no longer a broker for talks, then there would be no longer a need for the camp David accords, so US money would be cutting off money going to Egypt and the Palestinian authority. (Powell increased Palestinian money last year.) I also argue that Israel will pre-emptively strike if the US gets out of the picture.