Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jim McMannis who wrote (166242)	3/29/2003 11:28:18 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1583389

Lets call the "War Protesters" exactly what they are.. Bush haters This post nailed it. It is important to keep in mind who organized the original group of "protests": A.N.S.W.E.R. These idiots who are protesting are clueless as to the organization that is using them.

To: Jim McMannis who wrote (166242)	3/30/2003 2:56:16 AM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1583389

You might ask yourself why do so many people hate Bush if he's such a good man? And its not because he's right. Instead of worrying about the so called "Bush haters", you should be wondering what you are missing. But we all know that would take too much work and its easier to put it on the on the Bush haters.

To: Jim McMannis who wrote (166242)	3/30/2003 9:07:37 AM
From: Alighieri	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1583389

"Lets call the "War Protesters" exactly what they are.. Bush haters. They hate President Bush, and they will do ANYTHING in their power to make him look bad or to take the opportunity to insult him. I am willing to be only about 10% of the people protesting the war are really truly doing it because they hate war.. The rest are just left wing extremists who are pissed off Bush won the election, and will do anything to make sure he is not re-elected. This is little more than lazy rationalization. There are lots of reasons for disliking this man...not the least of which is the appearance that he is either a deceptive bastard or a puppet...or a little of both. The condition of the country and the world are in no small measure a repudiation of the tenet below, so reassuring and central to his campaign for the presidency. Mr. Bush came to office determined, by his own account, not to swagger and not to overreach. "If we're an arrogant nation, they'll resent us," he said in the second presidential debate against Al Gore in 2000. "If we're a humble nation but strong, they'll welcome us." That was a promise to check hubris at the door, an effort to guard against the temptation to believe that because he had such awesome power at his fingertips, he could and should use it to achieve grandiose objectives. nytimes.com I understand that 9/11 changed things somewhat...but a switch so radical is a sure sign of absence of political fundamentals or blatant campaign lying or manipulation. In any case, the people who stand behind the swagger of this presidency were hired long before 9/11. Al