Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LindyBill who wrote (87894)	3/30/2003 10:30:58 AM
From: Eashoa' M'sheekha	Respond to of 281500

" those that don't, the negative. " Ya shuuuurrre. That's like saying anyone who does an analysis of a company here on SI and brings people's attention to possible negative aspects of the business are short selling. That argument went out the window years ago when SOMEpeople realized there were actually honest people out here willing to take some heat for posting realist expectations,among,of course,the ACTUAL shorts.<GG> Those who whined and blasted everyone who said anything negative soon tuned out themselves being blasted by those who they sucked in with their RAW RAW - TO THE MOON postings. Get real Lindy. You were the one,along with the usual suspects here, comparing this adventure to the Liberation of France. Hope you didn’t cause anyone to lose their marbles on THAT call. KC

To: LindyBill who wrote (87894)	3/30/2003 11:13:00 AM
From: KonKilo	Respond to of 281500

Those that want this to succeed are posting the positive stuff, those that don't, the negative. Lindy, GWB likes nicknames, so in his honor, I believe I'll dub you Binary Bill. With you, everything is Either/Or. Black/White. Left/Right Conservative/Liberal Where does this way of thinking leave those folks who think we are doing the right thing but in the wrong way?

To: LindyBill who wrote (87894)	3/30/2003 11:47:32 AM
From: Rascal	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

"Have I missed the discussion of Rummy and the generals?" I can see that Rummy and the Generals is pretty well covered in the Press on the morning shows. ___________________________________________________________ "And have the Neocons weighed in on Perle not being a lobbyist?" I can see that Rummy and the Generals is pretty well covered in the Press on the morning shows. What about the Neocon intelligentsia and moral high ground in light of the ethics of Perle? Other than Rummy saying he knows him for years and believes in him (maybe they have simpatico ethics?) I have seen no mention in the press. Has the thread addressed this? What are your feelings and rationalizations? Rascal@ likeanelepahnt.com OT Maybe we can give a "Special" prosecutor like Ken Starr $66 million dollars and 8 years to look in on the ethics and sexual peccadilloes of the Neocons. GGG :O) WahhhawahhhaWaaaaaha GGG :^)