Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sun Tzu who wrote (87912)	3/30/2003 10:39:56 AM
From: Nadine Carroll	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Correction. US hopes not to be occupying for an indefinite period of time. Your crystal ball must be working differently than mine. Because last I checked the troops we sent to Saudi some 12 years ago are still there. They are there because Saddam is still in power, no other reason. We're working on getting them out.

To: Sun Tzu who wrote (87912)	3/30/2003 10:45:58 AM
From: quehubo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

<<Correction. US hopes not to be occupying for an indefinite period of time. Your crystal ball must be working differently than mine. Because last I checked the troops we sent to Saudi some 12 years ago are still there. >> How many troops would still be in Kuwait and SA if Saddam had complied with the terms of the ceasefire? Or perhaps if we had driven all the way to Iraq in 1991 instead of 2003?