Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ron who wrote (88118)	3/30/2003 11:26:16 PM
From: Sig	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

<<<Rumsfeld Faulted For Troop Dilution>>> There are good things, and there are bad things How many troops would be on the ground today in Iraq, if Hans Blix or the French were permitted to conduct inspections for 2 weeks more,and then gave up because they were not working? Zero minus 4 days Can anyone say what the "proper" figure is or should have been sent to start with, assuming the operation started March 20 which of course, it did not because there would have been no troops over there. ( I am getting a bit confused here. Precise speculation is not my major field) Thats about as easy a question to answer as asking what the best day was to start the operation. Select answer below 1. Never 2. Earlier 3. Later 4. March 20 Sig@next guess.com