Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (166335)	3/31/2003 10:51:42 AM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1583681

The casualty count ave. per day is now equal or slightly higher than the Gulf War ave. and we have not gotten into the heavy fighting yet. The fighting in this war has been far, far more intense than the Gulf War ground campaign ever was. However, already we are seeing a lack of consensus among the generals Big surprise. The "Generals" (Ret.) wouldn't be doing it the way Franks is.

To: tejek who wrote (166335)	3/31/2003 4:46:14 PM
From: hmaly	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1583681

Ted Re...It would not be "incompetence" if one soldier was "talking of" shortages. Obviously, you're clueless about the process. Yes, Gen. Ray......how could I have ever doubted your view behind those rose colored glasses?!! Frankly, I agree with David on this. There is no way one would expect Rumfeld, or any general to be able to micromanage this down to individual soldiers. Rumsfald and the generals first of all deal with divisions, or at the minimum battalian sizes. Below that, what happens within a battalian would be up to that battalians supply chiefs. To say Rummy is incompetant because some soldier didn't get his two meals is ridiculous. If the whole division had to cut back, then that would be different.