Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Techplayer who wrote (382822)	3/31/2003 1:39:57 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Sorry, my bad.... But it looks like Boots and Coots has the subcontract from Halliburton: As recently as mid-February, the company acknowledged that creditors were pressuring it to file for bankruptcy, but its fortunes seemed to take a positive swing on March 6, when the Pentagon announced that it had a plan for fighting oil-well fires. Its plan was drafted by a unit of Halliburton, Vice President Dick Cheney's former employer, which has an agreement to subcontract oil-well firefighting to Boots & Coots. But its fortunes looked bleak again when, contrary to many expectations, the first days of the war produced only a relative handful of fires, compared with more than 700 in 1991. Danny Clayton, the operations manager of Boots & Coots, said on Monday that he was surprised that relatively few oil-well fires had started in Iraq so far. "It's as easy to destroy 90 wells as it is to destroy nine," said Clayton, who ran the company's oil-well firefighting operations in Kuwait after the 1991 war. "But there's still a good chance. They have several more oil fields, and I'm sure that they are not all secured yet." Perverse as it may sound, then, the company's fortunes -- indeed, its very existence -- seem to depend on a good many Iraqi oil wells being put to the torch. taipeitimes.com