Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: David Lawrence who wrote (382906)	3/31/2003 2:51:41 PM
From: MulhollandDrive	Respond to of 769670

i was writing earlier that if anything his reporting was taking on the veneer of a booster...and if he violated the agreed upon restrictions he should be removed. his style annoys me too, but in fairness i didn't see that he had done anything broadly speaking that we haven't seen daily since the inception of the war (analysts with telestrators defining our strategy and positions)....that being said...he is in the field and could be privy to more battle specific information and should be held to a higher standard. another question you could ask.....who in the 101st disclosed the plan of attack to him? i have seen some of the field reporters say things like "we are headed north, thus far we haven't been told where we are going" things like that...so my impression was also that the field reporters weren't being given full descriptions of the missions. also my impression was that they were told what they could and could not report.