Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Stop the War! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill who wrote (6152)	4/1/2003 11:14:49 AM
From: ChrisJP	Respond to of 21614

austinpowers.com Was I close ?

To: Bill who wrote (6152)	4/1/2003 11:44:39 AM
From: Doug R	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 21614

Is there a scale of evil we need to refer to? Like "A" is pretty darn evil but not quite entirely evil while "B" is somewhat but not preponderantly evil while "C" is jumpin' up and down uncontrollably evil, and "D" is evil around the edges but not really so bad. Or is it just a sharp dividing line with absolutely evil on one side and absolutely good on the other with no reason to think there might be socio-religious-cultural differences on the matter? And is there a written in stone methodology in the treatment of each representative along the scale? Is someone who hasn't before been known to act in an evil manner but is thinking evil thoughts an appropriate target? Should we put just one person in charge of the Dept. of Evil? If so, how do we go about choosing that person in such a way that what he/she will do is absolutely correct and for the better of all? Or should we all just get into cattle mode and go with whatever seems popular in reference to evil? Or maybe this "evil" argument for going to war is just a bunch of crap to suck in simpletons.