SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stop the War! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (6280)4/1/2003 11:29:01 PM
From: jttmab  Respond to of 21614
 
You can say that the the "language AND INTENT of 1441 was pretty clear" .... it's pretty clear to me also...but it's also obvious that the members of the security council differ on what 1441 intended. There was no agreement that 1441 authorized military force to be decided on by a member State.

It was not a member state document. It was a UNSC document.

Further, the US/UK/Spain could not even acquire a majority vote of the UNSC to authorize it.

jttmab


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News