Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Policy Discussion Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: zonder who wrote (5391)	4/2/2003 6:42:57 PM
From: Hawkmoon	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 15987

And so? What does that mean? Uhh... what you want me to do.. spell it our for you?? They both hate us, and as the adage goes that I'm sure your familiar with, "the enemy of my enemy is my friend"... I can't think of what else I would need to say... They both have reasons to cooperate together against what they perceive is their mutual enemy. In fact, I would bet Bin Laden was financed by Iraqi intelligence, since he was undermining the Saudi Royal family, as well as creating a movement aimed at removing American forces from the region. That's something Saddam would have EVERY desire to see occur. Then he could take care of Bin Laden later on... Do you need to be reminded that the burden of proof lies on the accuser? But that only one "count" in the overall "indictment" against Saddam. He's a terrorist.. promotes terrorism, supports terrorism, harbors terrorism.... This is a war against terror, not just Bin Laden (when will you understand that?) and he's guilty as charged... Regardless of whether sufficient and confirmable facts arise that link him to Bin Laden. Hawk