SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Strictly: Drilling II -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Douglas V. Fant who wrote (30071)4/2/2003 8:38:54 PM
From: Art Bechhoefer  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 36161
 
Not knowing the details of these earlier battles, I hesitate to give an opinion. But it seems to me that this is not another battle of Kursk, as you have described it. There are two possible scenarios:

The Iraqi defenders are now totally disorganized, allowing coalition forces to move into Baghdad with only token resistance.

The Iraqi defenders are putting up only sporadic resistance and withdrawing into the streets of Baghdad, away from the open fields that are somewhat similar, from a military point of view, to those at Kursk. In this latter scenario, resistance from sniper attacks could continue for months, even after the government had capitulated.

How do these scenarios translate into stock prices? The first scenario seems to be what traders are believing, and it results in a 200+ point gain in the Dow, with drops in oil and gold prices. The second scenario creates more uncertainty, a GREAT DEAL MORE COST, resulting pressure on the U.S. budget, balance of payments, value of the dollar against foreign currencies, higher taxes (mainly for state and local jurisdictions that are getting less federal money), and a slew of other factors that aren't entirely predictable. Under this scenario, the long term trend for equities is probably down, owing to higher interest rates and weak consumer demand. Oil prices drop, mainly because of lower worldwide demand, but gold prices remain strong--probably above $330--because of the weakness of the dollar.

Frankly, it looks like a lousy market over the next six months to a year, and I'm having a lot of trouble finding anything worthwhile investing in.

Art



To: Douglas V. Fant who wrote (30071)4/2/2003 10:14:52 PM
From: t4texas  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 36161
 
doug, thanks for the info. i was not familiar with the tank battle at kursk.



To: Douglas V. Fant who wrote (30071)4/5/2003 7:41:46 PM
From: Sharp_End_Of_Drill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 36161
 
Douglas, thanks for the recap of Kursk. Classic battle, with classic outcome.

The big differences here are many. At Kursk the Soviets knew the plan and were able to prepare - Hitler was too arrogant to believe his forces couldn't punch through with a full frontal assault. In this case the Iraqis have no intelligence, and the coalition has all the initiative and freedom to adapt. Toss in overwhelming technical advantage and it doesn't really wash as a comparison.

It is easy to arm chair quarterback, I've always felt the Germans should have led on the Russians as they did, and then attacked another sector of the front that wasn't dug in and well prepared.

Sharp