Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wizard who wrote (155118)	4/2/2003 2:28:10 PM
From: Oeconomicus	Respond to of 164684

You sound like an anti-semite in your last few messages. You are the wizard of the obvious. ;-)

To: Wizard who wrote (155118)	4/3/2003 7:19:27 PM
From: craig crawford	Respond to of 164684

>> Israel has one sliver of land in a massive region yet the Arab world can't tolerate even that. << what relevance does the size of israel have on our debate? just because israel controls a small section of land is justification for imperialism? and for your information that tiny sliver seems to have grown on a continual basis since the day israel was founded. it magically seems to grow after every conflict israel participates in. this is plain evidence that israel has something to gain from never-ending conflict with the arabs. every time there is a war or conflict israel goes on a land grab. yet we are told that it's only the arabs that don't want peace. hmmm...how could israel snatch more land if there was peace? they couldn't! there would be no justification. >> You can accuse me of whatever you want but that is how I see it and that is how the international community sees it. << i don't think the intl community sees it the same way you do as all. i think that is a ridiculous statement. >> It was Arafat who turned down the last deal. If I were running Israel, that would have pissed me off too. And that is a big reason why the world has given up on Arafat << yet you neglect to mention that sharon opposed the exact same deal and for that matter every other deal as well! yet i don't see the president or the media giving up on sharon, calling for him to step down. hypocrisy. the simple fact is, sharon is no more a man of peace than arafat is. >> He is a failed leader << i don't think his people believe that. you and your zionist brethren may believe that however. >> If a deal gets put together this year or next and Sharon backs out, he will be a failed leader too << there will be no deal. get a grip on reality. >> You sound like an anti-semite in your last few messages << anyone who doesn't toe the jewish line appears to be an anti-semite. that is how the supremacist jews have framed the debate. anyway it doesn't bother me to be called that so feel free.