Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rat dog micro-cap picks... -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: WhatsUpWithThat who wrote (11490)	4/2/2003 7:00:28 PM
From: Lazarus_Long	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 48461

of course there were protestors then, too. There were????? I don't remember any. You got links? Some of these interventions, however, were under the auspices of the UN, They were????? You got the resolution numbers? Clearly also not all protests are politically motivated. Of course they are. You're protesting something the gov't is or isn't doing. That's political. Absolute statements like "Not a one, nada" weaken any argument. Not if it's true it doesn't. ome of the heaviest protesting during the 60's was while a Democrat was in office... I'm aware of that. Vietnam was a bipartisan affair: Eisenhower, JFK, LBJ, Nixon. My question is, "Why did if Clinton get a free pass?" When Bush takes military action, THe Usual Suspects are out trying to sgut down the country. Yet with Clinton there was not a peep. Threat to the US? You say Iraq is no threat? Then what do you say of Yugoslavia? Rwanda? Somalia? Sudan?