Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (89388)	4/2/2003 11:07:50 PM
From: LindyBill	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Blair is more powerful than any British prime minister since Churchill. And the last of his kind. The news out of Brussels shows that they are intent on making it impossible for any EU nation to go to war without their permission. Blair's Labor Party will go along, and the Conservatives can never muster the votes to stop it. So this is probably the last time we will fight side by side with the Brits.

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (89388)	4/3/2003 3:10:13 AM
From: KLP	Respond to of 281500

Mr. Sullivan indeed hits the nail square on...both on Bush and Blair.. It is very obvious to anyone with any human sensitivity at all to see that both men are aging before our eyes, and both care deeply about the safety of the world. I personally think while both are ambitious, neither one really cares about much else except steming the tide of terrorism for our mutual countries, but the entire world. If we don't do it, it is quite possible that nothing else will matter, after all.

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (89388)	4/3/2003 5:12:38 AM
From: LindyBill	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

I kinda like this proposal. Bush should make it during next year's "State of the Union," or some other appropriate time. REASON Let Jews leave Europe for America By Ronald Bailey "French Jews Tell of a New and Threatening Wave of Anti-Semitism," ran the headline in the March 22 issue of The New York Times. The Times noted, "Swastikas, slogans and physical assaults against Jews in Europe have reached a frequency not seen since the 1930s when Fascism was on the rise." There have been more than 100 anti-Semitic incidents in Paris in the first 3 months of 2003. And France is not alone; during the election campaign last year, Jurgen Mollemann, deputy chairman of the Free Democrats raised the specter of anti-Semitism by reviving the old canard that German Jews have a dual loyalty. No doubt, the resurgence of European anti-Semitism is fueled by a growing Muslim population angered by Israel's battle against the new Palestinian intifada, but the germs of that particularly noxious infection of the European body politic have never really gone away. Consequently, I would like to offer a modest proposal that will partially correct a historic wrong while simultaneously poking a sharp stick in the eyes of European critics of the United States?invite any European Jew who fears anti-Semitic persecution to immigrate here. The historic injustice this would correct was that the United States refused to increase the immigration quota for European Jews trying to escape the Nazis, thus condemning tens of thousands if not millions to death. America should be open to all immigrants, but a cohort of highly educated European Jews would certainly be a plus for our society and our economy. As for the morally smug European leaders, who wouldn't enjoy the spectacle of Jacques Chirac and Gerhard Schroeder trying to explain why so many of their citizens are fleeing their countries? reason.com