Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JakeStraw who wrote (384711)	4/3/2003 10:24:03 AM
From: Rock_nj	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

Oh, I get it. You mean the UN resolutions that Isreal has been violating for decades? And why aren't we attacking Isreal? The UN is just a puppet for the oil barrons to get their way. If the logic is that Saddam should be disarmed because he is a threat to his neighbors, then certainly the same logic could be applied to the U.S. as we've attacked our neighbors from time to time like Panama in 1989. We attacked Afganahstan. And we are now attacking Iraq. Politcal and policy arguments aside, it's not fair to single out Saddam for disarmament, not matter how ruthless he may be. Many people in the world view the U.S. as a ruthless agressor and would like to see us disarmed. But, they can't because we dictate the terms to the world.