Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jerrel Peters who wrote (384713)	4/3/2003 10:29:54 AM
From: Rock_nj	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 769667

Iraq is a direct threat to the United States? Are you mad. Just how is Iraq going to attack us? If terrorists needed WMD they could buy them much more easily from North Korea than from Iraq. N. Korea has nuclear bombs and has shown a willingness to sell weapons to anyone who wants them, because they need cash badly. North Korea is clearly more of a threat to the U.S. in regards to terrorism then Saddam Huessein ever was. Yet, we attack Iraq.

To: Jerrel Peters who wrote (384713)	4/3/2003 10:32:13 AM
From: Enam Luf	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769667

That is such horseshit. This IS about oil. It has always been about oil. Now mind you I don't necessarily believe there is anything wrong with that. We do what we have to and what is in our best interest. Now Saddam is certainly a bad guy, and taking him out is a good thing, but that is more opportunism than anything else. If you are looking for the truth behind our policy, you need look no further than Saudi Arabia.