Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JohnM who wrote (89543)	4/3/2003 11:34:04 AM
From: michael97123	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

John, I understand how you see it. His posts are sharp. So either reply with rebuttals or just dont reply at all. Telling him to avoid excess caffeine or wishing him a sarcastic good morning do no good. mike

To: JohnM who wrote (89543)	4/3/2003 11:44:11 AM
From: carranza2	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

Still no substance? I suppose you know when you've been licked. I thought my post was fair commentary on the ridiculous notion that the nation-wide response to DeGenova--and his comments on "fragging" and a "million Mogadishus"--was somehow indicative of the right wing Wolf Pack's attempt to subvert academic freedom. Your views would censor anyone who criticizes the more extreme (m)academia nuts, treating the poor, helpless, pacifist, penurious, oppressed fellows as victims who deserve mollycoddling because of their status as poorly-paid keepers of the flame of purity and reason. I suppose that's OK with you, though the double standard and the hypocrisy inherent in that thinking is quite obvious to me. One sort of First Amendment for the academics and another for their critics, right?