SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: elmatador who wrote (30763)4/4/2003 6:42:42 AM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 74559
 
Hello Elmat, <<The script doesn't add up>>

Here is a script:
(a) Preemptive strike against Iran and then Syria
(b) Saudi Arabia mob control operation next
(c) To be financed by Japan, in exchange for access to ME oil, protection against N.Korea, and purchase orders
(d) To be acquiesced by China with continuing recycling of trade dollars, in exchange for same oil and purchase orders
(e) To be acquiesced by India in exchange for Pakistan peace, palatable Kashmir solution, and right to remain in nuclear club
(f) To be encouraged by Israel in exchange for perceived security
(g) To be watched in alarm by Russia, France, Germany
(h) To be abandoned by UK due to popular opposition
(i) NMD tests successful in controlled circumstance, emboldening the neo-con hawks w/ strong support of extreme Christian Right
(j) TeoTwawKi dusk
(k) Alliance shifts
(l) elections are lost
(m) WMD arms race continues in any case, given that NMD cannot work, and that MAD still rules
(n) Empire vs rebellions
(o) TeoTwawKi night

Critical point of leverage and tipping point is around the Dollar, that magical printed paper used to buy stuff with.

Chugs, Jay



To: elmatador who wrote (30763)4/4/2003 2:10:18 PM
From: RealMuLan  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 74559
 
this comment echoes yours.

Iraqis fighting a mysterious war
Somethings Amiss, And No One Can Figure It Out

4/4/03 11:34:03 AM
Discuss this story in the forum
The Australian Age

Analysis -- theage.com.au
Iraqis fighting a mysterious war

April 4 2003

By John Keegan

...

Saddam, or whoever is in charge, is fighting the strangest war. Indeed, it is tempting to wonder, on the evidence so far presented, whether the Iraqis have been fighting a war at all.

Admittedly there has been a certain amount of sniping and loose shooting. Iraqis in civilian clothes have been firing at American and British soldiers. However, that seems about the extent of enemy activity.

Consider what the Iraqis have not done. They did not defend their frontier with Kuwait. The coalition forces passed through unopposed.

They scarcely defended Umm Qasr, Iraq's only and vital port. It fell after three days.

They have not fought any large-scale or even small-scale battles, though the territory of their country is being eaten up day by day.

More mysteriously, they have neither demolished nor seriously defended any of the bridges over the Tigris or the Euphrates, which are essential to the coalition's movements into the country.

If Saddam had some great counter-attack force preparing a trap for the coalition in the national heartland, one might fear that the abandonment of the bridges intact was a devilish plot, designed to make all come right for him in one sudden reversal of fortune.

But because he does not possess such a force, Iraq's defensive strategy, if it can be so called, appears casual to the point of carelessness.

Moreover, looking through the other end of the telescope, what Iraq has failed to do amounts also to an inexplicable abdication of advantage. Blown bridges are strong defences, as long as blown in time.

What is Saddam up to? Does he believe he can inflict such casualties on the Americans outside Baghdad that they will lose heart and go home? Does he believe he can fight and win a battle of Baghdad? Did he so much underestimate his enemies that he made no proper preparations? Did he so much overestimate the importance of Franco-German protest against this war that he was persuaded he did not need to? Or is it simply that Saddam is disabled or dead and that no one of his megalomaniac determination is running the Iraqi war effort?

Some explanation is necessary. Strategic analysis does not work. This is a deeply mysterious war.

Perhaps there will be a big battle over the next few days, through which the Iraqi hand will be revealed. But that seems improbable.

Unless and until there is some serious fighting, observers will be left with the eerie impression that the Second Gulf War is not really taking place.

Military historian and author Sir John Keegan is defence editor of The Daily Telegraph, London.



To: elmatador who wrote (30763)4/4/2003 2:18:18 PM
From: LLCF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74559
 
Everyone's given up... we win [again]... aren't you surprised it lasted this long [in an organized manner]?

I don't know why they didn't take all their weapons home and wait for the knock at the door.

DAK