Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: The Duke of URL© who wrote (173980)	4/4/2003 1:12:40 PM
From: Win Smith	Respond to of 186894

Demoaner's missive and subsequent traffic can be viewed at realworldtech.com I particularly liked the 5th post in that thread, realworldtech.com where Demoaner gets confused by somebody who quoted a bit of his original post and starts arguing with himself: Name: Paul DeMone (pdemone@igs.net) 4/2/03 Jim (yo@yo.yo) on 4/2/03 wrote: --------------------------- >Paul DeMone (pdemone@igs.net) on 4/2/03 wrote: >--------------------------- > >> >>Serious pressure to address an non-existent (IA64) market? Where is this >>(IA64) market? Where are the masses of large businesses and mid-size >>businesses who are buying (ITANIUM II) and (ITANIUM) systems from HP to >>do critical "64 bit stuff" they can't currently do on POWER4 systems? Probably a lot of the same businesses (as well as institutions, schools, labs, and government agencies) that buy HP PA-RISC and DEC/Compaq/HP Alpha systems instead of POWERx or PowerPC based IBM gear. BTW, you can always ask the IBMers responsible for its IPF based systems who they hope to sell their wares to starting in a few months if you need a few more ideas about this "non-existent" market. The >> part was straight out of the original post, and Jim yo@yo.yo posted only the quote.