Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: benwood who wrote (233472)	4/4/2003 12:37:35 PM
From: Win-Lose-Draw	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

parallel in the last century to such a thinker yep. i said a long time ago this was less like bush2 and more like nixon2. -g/ng-

To: benwood who wrote (233472)	4/4/2003 12:37:36 PM
From: yard_man	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

perhaps I misunderstood your question -- but your expansion on this seems like a tautological statement --- There are many regards in which Bush is the ONLY ONE He is the only president of the United States. He is the only president of the world's superpower. He is the only one that could have order the attack on Iraq as he is commander in chief. Also, he must think in his heart that he is right. Would you want a president to make decisions that he only "kinda thought" might perhaps be correct and give up power to some supra-national body in the process -- No, I don't. I may not agree with his decision -- but Bush is no Hitler if that is what your implying -- that's just plain stupid, if that's what you mean.