Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: paul_philp who wrote (90468)	4/5/2003 10:22:35 PM
From: maceng2	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Yes, there is a subtle difference in the UK news.. "Despite no clear proof one way or the other, Blunkett told BBC radio yesterday that he would be pleased if coalition forces were unable to find any WMD. 'The danger of finding them means there is a danger of them being used, not only against our own forces but also against the Iraqi people, even by accident,' he said." sundayherald.com More on Blunkett, from the Guardian, on deportations.. politics.guardian.co.uk [I don't know what the writer is so worked up about, UK immigration has tried to throw out normal citizens (over 60 yrs old in country) applying for passports but were WW2 babies born in the USA, but returned to the UK shortly afterwards] UK immigration is applying it's incompetency with a even hand..