SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stop the War! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Doug R who wrote (8324)4/6/2003 1:39:47 AM
From: Sojourner Smith  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 21614
 
First I am not in the CIA and I don't work with the terrorist group. Which I said is the only way
anyone would know for sure.

You implied that it was in the north and therefore not
under Saddam's control. The no-fly zone has limited
Saddam movements, so it would be logical choice that he would use another way to get to the Kurds.

If I were lying why would I post something that doesn't support my argument 100%. We both can find articles all day
that could support any point.

You are lying because you won't address the issues the source that confirm my argument (and Powell's arguments to the UN).
You will rule out anything that doesn't support your view,
because your bias is clearly anti-US, anti-Israel, pro-
Saddam.

I am pro-US, pro-Israel, anti-Saddam. And that is the truth.



To: Doug R who wrote (8324)4/6/2003 1:45:41 AM
From: Sojourner Smith  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 21614
 
Here is what I said.
Message 18802770

It was not in the control of the Kurds.
If it was - why did they kill several Kurdish leaders last month.
If it were Iran's control they would have been based in Iran.

The question is how much control did Saddam have over them.
Does seem odd right before the war, the group killed
the Kurdish leaders. Clearly they were helping Saddam.