To: waitwatchwander who wrote (2886 ) 4/6/2003 7:27:04 PM From: Eric L Respond to of 9255 Trevor, << You forgot to mention that by the time TIW had become what you call the "Great White Hope" of cdma 2000 in Europe they were already a basket case from all their soured telecom deals. Just like Mr. Dantas, TIW folks were interested in nothing more than wheelin' and dealin'. ... Also, since you bring up IMT-2000 in Korea, the other thing that one needs to consider in understanding the workings of TIW is their relationship with CDP Capital. Without those deep pockets, TIW was nothing. >> It wasn't that I had forgot to mention ... It was actually that I had lost track of these dudes. That is why I sincerely thanked you for posting the article elsewhere that I reposted here. I learned some things from the article that previously I was unaware of. TIW captured some press as a result of their potential involvement in the European IMT-2000 auctions in 2000. Qualcomm's powerful Washington lobby headed by Lieutenant General Brent Scowcroft, USAF (Ret.), and consisting of US Secretary of State Madeline Albright, Secretary of Trade Representative Charlene Barshefsky, Secretary of Commerce William Daley and FCC chairman William Kennard, had cleared the way for technologies other than 3GSM WCDMA (UMTS) to be employed in Europe's 3G IMT-2000 spectrum. TIW was a possible to bid for spectrum declaring for CDMA2000 as was the first user of cdmaOne IS-95, Hutchinsin Whampoa. At about the same time TIW captured more press as a potential contributor to saving some core IMT-2000 spectrum in Korea after the Korean government stepped in to mandate that at least one of the 3 licenses should go to someone willing to build out CDMA2000 in 2.1 GHz. I sort of lost track of them after that other than sexing references to Prague based ClearWave and their Czech subsidiary Cesky Mobil and MobiFon in Romania which appear to be flourishing. << WRT TIW in Europe, wasn't cdma 450 just TIW's way of attract a buyer for their illiquid Dolphin assets? >> It appeared so then and it appears so now. Qualcomm is easily stroked, unfortunately. << Doesn't it say something that no European operator was interested in outbidding Inquam and adding cheap Tetra assets to their stable? >> Of course it does. I am less familiar with how 450 MHz spectrum is regulated in France than I am in the UK but I do know that in the UK there are a batch of loosely regulated specialized services that occupy a relatively narrow frequency band. I think it should tell you something that "no European operator was interested in outbidding Inquam and adding cheap Tetra assets to their stable." It did me ... and as a Qualcomm investor I dug down on this considerably harder than most of the win bats that shoot off their mouths on the various wireless message boards. - Eric -