SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Idea Of The Day -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: 2MAR$ who wrote (43983)4/7/2003 2:35:04 AM
From: IQBAL LATIF  Respond to of 50167
 
Interesting and quite intriguing view point...

Decoding Bible's 'cryptogram'
Will Saddam Hussein be overthrown? Where is Osama bin Laden hiding? For answers, see the Good Book

Ron Csillag
National Post

Monday, March 31, 2003


Author Michael Drosnin believes the Bible, which includes the story of Moses, holds prophetic codes.

Among the hundreds of meetings and briefings that took place in the Pentagons bowels in the months leading up to Operation Iraqi Freedom, one earned the fleeting disdain of The New York Times, whose columnist, Bill Keller, sniffed that "several man-hours of valuable intelligence-crunching time" had been "consumed [by a writer] who claims -- I am not making this up -- that messages encoded in the Hebrew text of the Old Testament provide clues to the whereabouts of Osama bin Laden.

"Maybe were all a little too desperate these days for a simple formula to explain how our safe world came unhinged," Keller said.

The gathering, which reportedly took place Feb. 21, was said to have been convened by Paul Wolfowitz, the hawkish U.S. Deputy Secretary of Defence, and attended by 10 top military intelligence officials, including Vice Admiral Lowell "Jake" Jacoby, director of the massive Defense Intelligence Agency, and Wolfowitz's deputy, Linton Wells, who is in charge of the Pentagon's nerve centre, known as 3CI (Command, Control, Communications).

On the eve of war, the military brass listened intently for a full hour as Michael Drosnin expounded on his two brisk-selling volumes on the Bible code.

Drosnin argues the Hebrew Torah -- the first five books of the Old Testament -- were intentionally encrypted, by a higher power, with prophetic warnings that have accurately predicted the Great Depression, the Second World War, the Kennedy assassinations, the moon landing, Watergate, and 9/11 -- and foretell the fall of Saddam Hussein and the precise location of bin Laden.

The Americans "took it very seriously," Drosnin says. "They're practical people and I wanted to give them something of practical use."

As a result of the meeting, Drosnin says U.S. and Israeli intelligence forces are hot on bin Laden's trail in that very place the Bible mentions, "right as we speak." Of course, he would not divulge where that place is.

As for Saddam Hussein, the Bible's embedded code ponders, "Who is destroyed?" and then, in the same matrix, answers, "Hussein," with the following number crossing his name: 5763, the Jewish year that corresponds to 2003. "That foretells the outcome of this conflict," Drosnin says confidently. "It might be obvious now, but it wasn't when I told them."

It could be that the U.S. defence establishment is grasping at straws, or that more and more people in Washington are motivated by a White House that frequently invokes God and religious imagery. Drosnin discounts the religious angle.

"This is not based on faith. This is based on experience. The code keeps coming true."

Drosnin is a secular Jew, a former police reporter for the Washington Post and former writer for The Wall Street Journal. To be sure, his books, The Bible Code (1997) and last year's sequel, Bible Code II: The Countdown have been used by various fundamentalists, prophets of doom and supermarket tabloids as sure signs the Good Book knows all and that the end is nigh. Detractors point out the code violates the Bible's own ban on soothsaying.

Drosnin himself says he did not fully believe the code's power until Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin was murdered in November, 1995. Having learned Hebrew and the computer program that searches for hidden words, he found "Yitzhak Rabin" intersected with the letters that formed "assassin that will assassinate." Drosnin says he warned the doomed leader in a letter in September, 1994, that the Bible predicted he would be assassinated during that Jewish calendar year.

After the killing, the word "Amir" was found as part of the same grid (Rabin's killer was Yigal Amir.) Drosnin remembers his reaction: "Oh my God. It's real."

The idea of a secret text embedded in the Bible is hardly new. In the 12th century, European rabbis wrote about discovering meaningful words hidden in the Hebrew text of the Torah. Isaac Newton, the scientist who discovered gravity, obsessively searched the Bible for the "cryptogram set by the Almighty," in the words of John Maynard Keynes in a biographical sketch of Newton. But lacking a computer, Newton could only speculate. He did, however, set a date for Armageddon, based on his research: 2060.

Sixty years ago in Prague, Rabbi Michael Ber Weissmandl expanded the search. But the true breakthrough came in the early 1990s by a team of Israeli mathematicians led by Eliyahu Rips, an expert in group theory, a field that underlies quantum physics.

Using a computer, Rips converted the Bible into a string of 304,805 Hebrew letters, minus spaces, and looked for names of great Jewish sages in close proximity to their birth and death dates. He was astonished to find many matches, and calculated the probability of finding his results by random at one in 10 million. His paper, entitled Equidistant Letter Sequencing in the Book of Genesis, was published in the journal Statistical Science in 1994. The math in the thrice-refereed work was pronounced ironclad. The coup-de-grace, as it were, came when Harold Gans the United States top cryptologist at the U.S. Defence Department set out to disprove Rips work and ended up corroborating it

Thus was born the primary tool of code research -- ELS, or equidistant letter sequencing.

What does a typical ELS look like?

The folks at biblecodedigest.com helpfully offer the following:

Suppose we start with the sentence, "All of our avenues are wide." To locate an ELS, we eliminate the spaces and look for words that could be formed from letters that are equally spaced within the string of letters that form the sentence.

So, if we start with the second letter (L) and then skip three letters to pick up the next letter of the code (O), and so forth, we find the word LOVE within the string: a L l o f O u r a V e n u E s a r e w i d e.

To Drosnin and the like-minded, the Hebrew Bible is a giant crossword puzzle that criss-crosses the entire text with a complex network of hidden phrases and words -- a computer program that could not have been written by humans.

He took the ELS concept a step further, using it to claim the Bible leads to secular prophecies. On Sept. 11, 2001, for example, his computer allegedly found "twin," "towers," "airplane" and "it knocked down" hidden in the Bible, and "sin, crime of bin Laden" intersected with "city and tower."

And apparently, the Big One is coming. Drosnin's most dire warning yet contains the words "world war," "atomic holocaust" and "end of days" all in the close vicinity of "2006." (Note the similarity to Newton's year of doom).

While Drosnin apparently has his fans in U.S. military circles, both Rips and Gans have distanced themselves from Drosnin's conclusions, saying using the Torah codes to predict the future is unfounded, futile and of no value.

Barry Levy, dean of McGill University's religious studies department and a Torah scholar, says, "I'm surprised to learn that the Pentagon is engaging in sorcery as part of its military strategy. There is nothing particularly spiritual or convincing or valid about this. It's entertainment,"

The major problem with the codes, as Levy sees it, is that the original Hebrew text of the Torah is long gone, and that results can vary wildly depending which of many versions of the Bible one uses -- and whether one believes the Bible is inerrant in the first place.

"The codes just confirm ideas people already have. To imagine this does anything other than provide spectacular entertainment is just silly," Levy says. "You could probably do this with a newspaper."

www.biblecodedigest.com/ page.php/74



To: 2MAR$ who wrote (43983)4/7/2003 3:57:29 AM
From: IQBAL LATIF  Respond to of 50167
 
<US-British calculations on Iraq "seriously wrong": India>

The problem is that some superpowers were riding on the coattails of the hyper power. The doctrine of new hyperpower has got a very real basis. The other superpowers have lost significant credibility.

Only time will tell but I am confident measures to build up nations and policy of correcting inequalities (if sincerely adopted) will help allay these fears, all politics is about 'welfare of an individual constituent of state.' Any state that fails its people is failed state, the distinguishing factor for humanity it to be able to rise above partisan ship, local political influences and preferences. Seeing the big picture is the name of the game, one can temporarily out of sync but within the greater loop of mankind. Freedom of man from chains of economic and ideological slavery is the natural course of history anyone who opposes it will fail the long standing test of times.

If you look at the genesis of this crisis the 'Political preferences' of liberals and left is the primary motive, the second being 'moral equivalence' of contemporary issues. Other than political ideology this strange marriage is partly encouraged by the envy of USA. This envy unites left and right of the political spectrum across the globe as strange bedfellows a new alliance of unwilling in this 2nd war of Gulf.

The political strain that combines the liberals and extremists under one cause is all about maintaining status quo of repressive regimes even if massive human right violations are carried out. The ideological Puritanism within the left and the right calls for status quo in most of the cases to be maintained, a civilian casualty of a repressive regime even if it is massive and regularly conducted carries no weight with the conscience of either left or right, for example human rights violations of Mugabe very rarely bothers Chirac so does human right violations and lack of expression in Iran are considered important by India, it is alliance of political nations that matters most and regional agendas these nations have. For Chirac Mugabe is a good bet for influence in Africa and for India a good repressive Iran is counter weight to Pakistan ambitions within Islamic world.

The sum total as far as non-aligned character of any regime is maintained and political mileage can be gained from these repressive regimes they are considered as better alternatives than freedom or pluralism .Let me be honest USA also has not shown in the past even in recent past a great deal of love in its dealing with the world, the most repressive regimes have been upheld by USA too, we as citizens of the world see a sea change of attitude and we hope that political opportunism will not once again dictate US policy it has to be broad humanity based, if a beginning in Iraq and Afghanistan has been made this doctrine of active support to remove human misery has to applied to all the places where atrocities are committed. This is the test for next few years this will elevate USA to new pedestal if it passes the test of courage and conviction.

The present political domination of the world by a uni-polar axis and pro-activism shown by the new unipolar axis is something that liberals as well as extremists cannot digest, the main cause being it takes away the initiative from the left and right, the political activity of the left and right centers around rights of oppressed in general terms since left and right have an interest to maintain the sponsors of terror on the seat of power, the left likes secularism of Saddam whereas right likes him for the religious fervour of ‘Jihad’ he plays at the same time both side of the divide. Freedom and voice of free people carries risk for any state, for most of the nations who are use to old standing habits a change is undesirable. India stands to loose in this realignment of power in Iraq for one reason only Iraq’s Saddam was the greatest ally of India, politically Saddam’s Iraq provided India with lot of political support vis a vis Pakistan within Arab world, it will be natural until dust settles India is not very happy with this change.

Oil contracts, long old friendships and deep alliances govern the landscape of present modern world, Saddam removal sends into tailspin a lot of long standing accepted wisdoms. A free Iraq would definitely bring a big change In the entire politics of Middle East the assertive nature and ability of the axis of wiling to carry out this huge operation causes a lot of consternation and envy amongst the other wannabees.

All these big nations like India, France and Russian boast a huge pride, in present circumstances their inability and lack of potency makes them very unhappy, don’t forget that UN nation security council by its very ineffectuality nurtures and breeds a false sense of equality, within greater powers like aforementioned it bestows them equal status albeit by default, now enjoying a super power status with little responsibility is a sure ticket of self aggrandizement.

France, Russia and to some extent China has savoured it quite a lot of this however paradoxically without paying for it! In this crisis this harsh reality of the difference between an 'ineffective super power' and 'active hyper power' has come to the surface.

Sometime we need to see how far one can press the advantage; I think an error of judgment by French is the main culprit. They tried to seek maximum advantage far too much without realizing their position if the bluff is called. The stark reality of their limitations has since dawned on may a nations they have also realised how much global economy is dependent on US as an island of stability.


The dagger in the heart of Saddam has made them realize of their redundant position and ineffectivety on the global scene. Their are no free lunches, the present scenarios have opened the eyes of many a wannabees of the huge gap between ambitions and realities.

Now the raw reality is that some are far bigger and potent than others, now it is for some pundits the issue of’ might is right’ for others the self interest demands that junior and senior powers should remain embedded within a false set of arrangement where hyper power are made ineffective to act because of the restrains imposed by uniformity of action. This crisis provided a very historic moment to unite and remove a regime that was a-humane; the collective action of the UN would have continued the purdah that helped hide the glaring disparities of the strong. The bluff of smaller of the three powers was self imposed disaster. Here the imagination and guile of Brits should be commended, the leftist Brit Pm had far greater vision to see al this and be counted on the right side, and the conservative Gaullist lost it.

Rather all the super powers within SC with exception of ‘alliance of the wiling’ lost it collectively, now either they have to grow and pay for being first amongst equals or just live with this new reality that their is a new hyper axis that has emerged, this itself is a very harsh reality, for wannabees to compete they need to spend a lot of money and lot of effort, strategy and effectively is not a short term goal, USA what it now is not by accident it is the long standing goals and long standing expenditures of hundred of billions, this status can be politically damaged but not equalled, it was a reality test for USA but it would be better if USA keeps engaging and in victory act with self imposed restraints to include al these wannabees. The greatness of true hyper power is inclusion and not exclusion.



To: 2MAR$ who wrote (43983)4/7/2003 3:59:52 AM
From: IQBAL LATIF  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 50167
 
Great day for mankind..

Ali Hassan al-Majid, dubbed "Chemical Ali" by opponents of the Iraqi regime for ordering a 1988 poison gas attack that killed thousands of Kurds, has been found dead, a British officer said Monday.


Maj. Andrew Jackson of the 3rd Battalion Parachute Regiment told The Associated Press that his superiors had confirmed the death of the man who was President Saddam Hussein (news - web sites)'s first cousin and one of the most brutal members of his inner circle.

Al-Majid apparently was killed on Saturday when two coalition aircraft used laser-guided munitions to attack his house in Basra. Jackson said the body was found along with that of his bodyguard and the head of Iraqi intelligence services in Basra.

Saddam had entrusted al-Majid with defense of southern Iraq against invading coalition forces.

Jackson said the discovery of al-Majid's body was one of the reasons the British decided to move infantry into the southern Iraqi city because they hoped with the top Iraqi leadership gone there, resistance might fall apart.

Believed to be in his fifties, al-Majid led a 1988 campaign against rebellious Kurds in northern Iraq in which whole villages were wiped out. An estimated 100,000 Kurds, mostly civilians, were killed.