Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (166810)	4/7/2003 10:02:07 AM
From: Alighieri	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1580635

Do YOU have a problem admitting you're wrong, TOO? Not when I am....but you extrapolate too far. What the article hints, and much of what's been written on the topic clearly has been concerned with, is the aftermath of the war....in Iarq and elsewhere in the world. You are witnessing the opening salvo....hoping I am wrong, I fear the trouble that lies ahead....I fear the effects of this euphoria on the war hawks. You can hear the chief war hawk spoiling to broaden the fight already... Al

To: i-node who wrote (166810)	4/7/2003 12:21:47 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1580635

David, <Do YOU have a problem admitting you're wrong, TOO?> Hey, lighten up. It's not everyday that liberals find themselves wrong on the facts and wrong on their conclusions. ;-) Right now, we have two separate reports of chemical weapons found. One is a storage site with sarin and phosgene. The other is 20 "ready-to-fire" missles with sarin and mustard gas. Watch as liberals now shift their arguments from "Saddam never had chemical weapons, or else the inspectors would have found them" to "Inspectors were never given enough time to find the weapons we knew Saddam had." It's very predictable. Tenchusatsu