Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Stop the War! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Doug R who wrote (9277)	4/7/2003 2:29:05 PM
From: AK2004	Respond to of 21614

Dog re: Characterizing the UN as such in your question shows it to be a prejudicial question...not worth a response. I thought Lorne was been kind to UN <gggggg>

To: Doug R who wrote (9277)	4/7/2003 7:11:48 PM
From: lorne	Respond to of 21614

Doug. I asked this question..." Do you think that those countries had any oil or arms reasons for their defense of sadam?'..... Your answer...." Immaterial question."..... You honestly think that the multi billion dollar contracts that france germany and Russia had with sadam are immaterial and played no part in their decision to back sadam? your joking right? My question..." And how about the toothless UN should they come to the aid of people like those in Iraq?".... Your answer..." Characterizing the UN as such in your question shows it to be a prejudicial question...not worth a response.".... Huh? where was the UN teeth in Rwanda, Kosovo? The only teeth that the UN has is the power of individual nations. If the UN wanted something done that required military power who has that kind of power and the ability to move that power around the world? Lets see if they realize their BIG mistake and start to suck up to the USA.