Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Alighieri who wrote (166877)	4/7/2003 5:51:50 PM
From: i-node	Respond to of 1580229

I don't think so. Fortunately, the righteousness of a war is determined by history, not by some political party's perspective. I may come around to forgetting that so many had to die How can you make such an obviously inept statement? So MANY had to die? The coalition has lost what, 200 (including the friendly fire incident in the North)? And the civilian casualties have been minimal -- probably in the hundreds, a figure far fewer than the number of people who die monthly at the hands of Saddam -- and most of them died at the hands of Saddam & his death squads. If you're mourning the deaths of the "Elite Republican Guard", "Chemical Ali", or the "Fedeyeen", I can only ask what is wrong with your thinking? It literally makes no sense.